Slough

[A long post with no pictures! Can you face it?! I wanted to get this out on Friday, but find my time constrained... I'll jazz it up soon... Maybe...]

Just before Christmas a poster called Phil Chamberlain posted a message on this site saying:

“I enjoy this blog a lot. However, it’s really about the upper middle classes – or rather, a particularly liberal section of it – rather than the “middle” middle class itself, which is busy reading the Daily Mail and living in places like Bromley, and not worrying itself in the slightest bit about ethical sourcing, yoga or anything similar.”

It struck a chord, even if I’m as confused as everyone else about the difference between upper, middle and middle class. Where do the boundaries lie? If, for instance, our ruler David Cameron is, as he likes to claim, upper middle class rather than just a toff I’m clearly not writing about the upper middle classes. But I suppose it isn’t beyond the realms of possibility that Dave might be trying to fool us. Meanwhile, I guess the main point Phil Chamberlain made stands however you choose to slice up our absurdly complicated class system. This blog has been pretty narrow in scope so far. As Phil rightly says I’m basically writing about liberal inner city Guardianistas for whom food is more of a competitive sport than a means of sustenance, for whom the suburbs are as alien and frightening as the Gobi desert and who definitely don’t clean the car on a Sunday.

So what of this other middle England? Just as I was wondering what I should write about it, some PR company put out a survey claiming to have found the heart of middle Britain. Yes, this was a transparent attempt to get publicity – and yes, I’ve been suckered right in (twice!), but the results still seemed fairly interesting to me.

These are the top ten towns in Middle Britain that they identified:

1     Slough
2     Rushmoor
3     Bexley
4     Spelthorne
5     Harrow
6     Bracknell Forest
7     Broxbourne
8     Hillingdon
9     Dartford
10     Milton Keynes

That list might as well have come from a book I once co-edited called Crap Towns. These are not places like Crouch End and Lewes. They are distinguished by roundabouts and appalling architecture rather than their over-priced delis, and three-wheeler buggies. Indeed, plenty of them did feature in Crap Towns. Slough, the number one town, featured especially heavily for obvious Betjeman-related reasons – and because of a hilarious campaign by residents of nearby Windsor to get their own postcode so that they didn’t have their addresses tarnished by the “SL” brand.

Crap Towns was written in what now seem like the halcyon days of New Labour. Back when it seemed terribly unfair that some places should be so much worse than others since there was so much money sloshing around the UK. I doubt that it would be half as funny to try to do a book like that nowadays. There would certainly be less point as there’s no hope that anywhere is going to get better anytime soon. That said, I did get a familiar twinge of excitement when I re-googled Slough and pretty much the first thing that came up was this hilarious website. Any town that needs to set up a website called Proud to be Slough clearly has image problems. Particularly if the pull quote on that site reads: “Slough has an energy which rivals the heart of London.” John Ryan , Sales Manager, Formula 1 Karting.

Google also taught me that:

1) Slough has the highest proportion of religious adherents in England. This strikes me as further bad news. It’s not so much the boring pious neighbour aspect of that figure that troubles me, but the desperation it suggests. Life in the real world, when the real world is Slough seems to have driven a lot of people into yearning for less distressing imaginary alternatives.

2) According to research by the Campaign to Protect Rural England (CPRE) in 2006, Slough is England’s least tranquil area.

3) Astonishingly, the local council are trying to make Slough even more ugly. Here’s a quote from Twentieth Century Society:

“[A] tragically high quantity of good buildings have been demolished in Slough in recent years, including grand Art-Deco-styled factories by the likes of Wallis Gilbert and high-quality post-war offices. More are to come down as the town tries to erase its past and reinvent itself from scratch. Despite famously heckling Slough, John Betjeman’s praise for the Town Hall’s architecture as ‘a striving for unity out of chaos’ in 1948 has never been so relevant as today. C20 believes that the redevelopment of the Town Hall would be an act of vandalism to the civic centre and is supporting the Campaign to Save Slough’s Heritage in their request for a review of the decision.”

Of course, making the worst of a bad job has been a speciality ever since Betjeman wrote his famous poem inviting ‘friendly bombs’ to land on this “hell” in the 1930s. And yet, during all that time, Slough has also been getting steadily richer and steadily bigger. Something about the place clearly works. Some people clearly like it.

When I was working on the Slough bit of Crap Towns, I actually got quite a bit of positive feedback from people in the town, alongside the dozens of emails slagging it off. One of those correspondents even invited my co-editor and I to look around in the summer of 2003. We took her up on the offer while on an aborted attempt to write a kind of travelogue about Crap Towns in general (working title “To Hull And Back”).

Our tour guide clearly did like Slough. She actually had a very well paid job in the city and was there by choice, since it was a good place to escape the “madness” of the capital, but there wasn’t much she could show us that we liked. Quite a lot of the time was spent with her admitting that things were actually quite ugly, and us trying not to agree too strongly as that would seem incredibly rude. Quite a bit more of the time was spent in awkward silence. After all, what do you talk about with someone with whom your only link is a difference opinion about the town where they filmed the original series of The Office? Especially when you’re crammed into her little car and all too conscious of how badly your feet smell after several days on the road, tramping around the armpits of Britain.

We spent a long time in the car, driving around fairly aimlessly, as I remember. In my notebook I scribbled the following: “buildings sheer edges of cube-shaped office blocks and the bulbous plastic roofs of shopping malls on roads suspended above ground-level on concrete flyovers, curving between the squat buildings like a puny version of Fritz Lang’s vision of the high-rise buildings and layers of sky-highways in Metropolis.”

I wish I knew what that meant. I’m sure at the time it struck me as incredibly grand. I was basically trying to say that it was a bit ugly. The other thing I noted was how grey it was:
The buildings were grey, the bridges were grey, and the roads were grey. If you sliced open the office blocks they would no doubt reveal hundreds of grey men and women wearing grey suits sitting at grey desks.

I also made notes about “the garish reds and yellows of the shop signs and advertising hoardings.” So there must have been some colour. It was just all-artificial.

Eventually, I insisted that we get out of the car. Our guide didn’t like that, saying that people only generally walked in Slough if they were inside a shopping mall – if they had any sense. I realised why pretty quickly. Slough is one of those towns whose designers were convinced that people like nothing better than strolling through dimly lit concrete tunnels. It was a hot day and the sun was cooking up all kinds of bad smells. Piss, predominantly. But also tarmac, petrol and sugar. There was a big Mars Bar factory in Slough in those days and it added just the tinge of nausea to the air to make wondering around in the open(ish) air thoroughly unpleasant.

By this stage, our guide seemed to have defected. When we emerged from the tunnels, she said simply that we “hadn’t seen anything yet” and whizzed us back in the car to an estate of  pebble-dashed houses with boarded up windows clustered around a 16 storey brutalist tower block named, with a characteristic lack awareness, after the romantic poet Byron.

Just down the road from this poor housing were the gigantic hi-tech sheds of the Slough’s rich industrial estates. The money-making ability of these concerns was clear to see from the huge fleets of flash saloon cars gathered in the car parks outside, and the low level electric hum of constant activity and visible bustle within the plate glass windows.

They clearly weren’t splashing the cash on architecture though. The buildings were pretty much porta-cabins – just like the ones in the Ricky Gervais series. They were not, as the best buildings are supposed to be, designed for eternity. Not even tomorrow. They were just stopping places for constantly relocating, upgrading or downsizing companies who had no care for the local environment whatsoever. Betjamen would have written another, even nastier, poem if he had seen them.

I know this is hardly groundbreaking material. Slough is ugly. Everyone knows that. Our guide wasn’t expecting us to like it either. I eventually began to understand that the point she was trying to make was that she liked the place in spite of appearances.  Slough was, she explained, a place where she could feel comfortable, and not just because of inertia and the presence of her family and friends. It was easy to slip into the spirit of the town’s unrelenting blandness, to feel unique and yet at the same time have the sense that nobody expected anything of you. It was an argument I was to hear again and again over the next few months when doing the publicity run for the first book of Crap Towns. There was, as a man in a Slough’s branch of Ottakar’s bookshop explained to me, “a total lack of pretension” in the town and its people.

To illustrate her point, our guide took us out to one of the town’s large parks. It was bland too: flat and scrubby, grass yellowing in the sun and with a half drained concrete duck pond as its centrepiece. But it was also far easier than any of the big London parks. No one was on display here. No flash clothes. No ostentatious displays of Capoeira or martial arts. No hipster picnic parties from scrupulously retro hampers. Just people hanging out and sleeping under trees. I could see that it would provide real relief after a day spent in a high-pressure city job, as Cat had been trying to point out right from when we first met her. Slough, I concluded, is a town where it’s okay to be boring. In fact, it’s positively encouraged. And perhaps that’s what Middle Britain is about. A comforting blend of conformity and anonymity.

Perhaps…

Except there’s a big part of the story that I’m skipping over. I’d revise my conclusions about Slough now. Most people probably don’t like the fact that it’s dull any more than I did. They are there because it provides a good living. Slough’s always been a bit of a moneymaking machine.

Perhaps surprisingly, given the way it looks and feels, Slough isn’t a new town. It even gets a mention in the Domesday book and was a popular coaching stop for people heading west from London for several centuries, but it was only when a railway station was built there in the mid 19th century that the Slough we know and loath really came into being. It became a brick factory. For decades Slough provided a healthy percentage of the bricks that helped to build the Victorian Empire. And as the Empire receded in the 1920s the town developed the country’s first Industrial Estate, with generous tax allowances and relaxed planning laws for industrial concerns that wanted to set up there. When Betjeman wrote his poem huge developments of semi-detached “labour saving” homes had been built to house the workers from the local factories (like the huge Mars complex, which gives the air in the town that uniquely sickly flavour) which were thriving despite the world wide depression. Betjaman hadn’t seen half of it either, because the town almost doubled in size again in the 1950s and 1960s when huge tower block estates to house the thousands bombed out of their homes in London in the Second World War. Since the 1960s, it’s continued to grow fast specialising in ultra-hi-tech progressive industries: a triumph of hardheaded commercialism. According to wikipedia, recent new offices in the town include “those of Nintendo, Black and Decker, Amazon.co.uk and Abbey Business Centres.[27]” It’s also noted that: “Ferrari, Mercedes, Fiat and Maserati now have offices in the town.”

What does all this say about Middle England? I’m not sure. Maybe it’s less of a lifestyle choice than an economic imperative to live somewhere like Slough, so it’s wrong to talk about it in the same way. Maybe the conclusion is that Middle England doesn’t give a stuff about many of the things the so-called middle classes care for…

Or maybe I’ll just have to go to a few more places before I draw any conclusions.

Posted in MiddleClassTowns | 10 Comments

All in the ghetto

Careful readers of this site will already know that it’s compulsory for middle class men under the age of 40 to claim to like hip-hop. Which makes me especially pleased to present the following ill sounds:

In the track, the “MC” laments the arrival of lattes in a once cheap area, of creatives and professionals coming in hordes, and of bicycles acting as Trojan horses, and of “squatting like its hot”… Reminds me of Hackney when I moved there. Especially the line about someone getting shot outside “a vegan place I frequent”. That happened on my street!

Indeed, I’m just the kind of person that would probably annoy the hell out of Riz MC. Which is a shame because he’s quite good. And sounds much harder than I am.

PS – Thanks to Nikesh Shukla (@nikeshshukla) for tweeting me the link to this song. I’ve recently enjoyed reading his book Coconut Unlimited, so am pleased to have the chance to recommend it here.
PPS You may have seen RizMC playing Omar in the film Four Lions. He is very funny.
PPPS The Slough article is on the way, I promise. I’ve just been rather busy trying to earn the money I need to maintain my bourgeoise lifestyle and espresso habit. A man’s got to eat (Waitrose food), after all.
Posted in A-Z | 5 Comments

We Had It So Good: Linda Grant Q and A

Regular readers of this site will know that I’ve been promising an article about Slough for a long time now and repeatedly failing to produce the goods. It is on the way, I promise (again). But in the meantime, I’ve got something far, far better. It’s an interview with Linda Grant, the Booker-nominated, Orange prize-winning author. Her new book ‘We Had It So Good’ should be of particular interest to readers of this site not just because it’s wonderful – which it is – but because it gives one of the best fictional portrayals of an era of middle class history as you are likely to find. It traces the lives of four baby-boomers, Stephen, Andrea, Ivan and Grace… Actually Linda cleverly explains the setting in her first answer, so I’ll just cut to the chase:

It struck me that it’s possible to read We’ve Had It So Good as more than just as a summation of the Baby Boomer generation. It also tracks the trajectory of a very particular and very fortunate kind of middle class person.  Stephen and Andrea seemed to mark a kind of high point of middle class existence. Does that seem like a valid reading to you? And were you very aware of class when you were writing the book?

Yes, very much so. The characters are carefully plotted in class terms, they are a group of people who could only have met at university on he 60s and 70s and it was my intention to plot the rise and fall of that particular university-educated middle class who entered the workforce in the early Seventies. It was quite deliberate to put Stephen, Andrea and Ivan all in Islington, a, working class neighbourhood when they arrive there, full of fly-blown corset shops. I remember walking the length of Upper Street in the late Seventies trying to get a cappuccino and no-one knew what I meant. I found a caff with two urns. When I asked for a black coffee, no sugar, I was told that the milk was already in it. ‘This one’s with sugar, this one’s without.’ Each character comes from a particular class niche: Stephen, lower middle-class American, inheritor of the American dream, the vision of classlessness and progress; Andrea the daughter of the English middle-class who did badly after the war because they weren’t in touch with social change, clinging to gentility; Ivan, the son of the archetypal Hampstead lefty intellectuals (based on a family I knew); and Grace, the child of the Home Counties, a marriage crossing the tracks between the upper class wife and the scholarship boy who is going to get on, through education. So all of them arrive at Oxford and have this tremendous start, and rise more or less seamlessly, apart from Grace, the refusnik.

I also got a sense in the novel that this kind of lifestyle is coming to an end. After the high there’s a feeling that things are going to drop off. Without giving too much away, there’s a lot of death in there, the next generation don’t have such an easy time, the foundations upon which, for instance, Andrea’s life are based all seem to have been dismantled by the close. Do you feel that we’re coming to the end of a golden age of the middle classes? And if so, where does that leave us?

It was always my intention to depict a trajectory from youth to late middle age. Yes, all of them suffer a great diminishing, one way or another. It was their certainty that they were born to have nothing but good times happen to them that I wanted to explore.

Following on from that, an extra layer is added by the fact that Stephen is an American who steps into this very British world – but is never entirely assimilated. How was it imagining our British habits, hang-ups and tastes through the eyes of a semi-outsider? Did it reveal things about our way of life that were unexpected?


I needed a) someone who was the epitome of optimism, of the idea of the bright future, and a Californian seemed the best repository for that. But he’s also an outsider who doesn’t even want to be an insider, so it allows him alway to be restless, always to think that there’s something better, and for him to observe Englishness.

(I'll put a proper photo of the book up soon instead of this iphone one. Am just keen to run this interview right away as it's so very nice.)

You clearly also see plenty of the comedy value in the middle class setting. Grace and Ivan, for instance (although both tragic in their own ways) are very funny characters. Are they inherently ridiculous?

I think the only characters who aren’t ridiculous are Andrea and Max. Yes, please feel free to laugh at them. They deserve it, as fond of them as I am.

Elsewhere,  you’ve talked about the toxic-legacy of the Baby Boomer generation in terms of refusing to accept old age. You’ve also suggested that they have failed to appreciate just how lucky they are – and have consequently handed their children a considerably diminished inheritance. Could such criticisms also be expressed in class terms? Is middle class comfort based to a certain extent on ignorance and other the suffering of others?

This is a tricky one. The middle-class baby boomer generation was on the whole the first generation in their families to go to university. They were the product of post-war homes, and of parents who had had their own youth during the Depression and the War. So their parents really wanted the best for them, wanted the new convenience food, the foreign holidays, wanted their children to get on, to prosper. This is a generation, remember, born during rationing. So I don’t think it’s any shame that we grabbed the opportunities and the goodies that came to us. The problem is more the arrogance with which we believed this to be our natural right and our dismissal of the sacrifices our parents made for us. Many was the household where a veteran of the D-day landings was denounced as a fascist by their teenage son or daughter, waving round a copy of Socialist Worker.

As a Booker-nominated, Oxford-educated, Guardian contributing and extremely well-dressed Baby Boomer, you yourself are living what many would see as the middle class dream. Are you?! And how is it from the inside?

I didn’t go to Oxford, I went to York. My background is a little different because I as the child of immigrants. They saw things with simplicity – we want our children to get ahead. we want them to grab everything that’s  to be grabbed, so I don’t have the same feelings of guilt. This is what my parents wanted for my and I respect that. But yes, I went to university on a full grant, yes, I got onto the housing ladder at the tight time . . .

Following on from all that, one of the many big truths that the novel revealed to me is that such categorisations are ultimately flawed. The most important thing about Stephen, Andrea and Grace and co isn’t the way they fulfil a stereotype, but their individuality. As I read, it was their stories that took over. The characters became the most important and emotive elements of the book, not so much the generalisations about a generation.  So is it – in fact – a mistake to talk about middle classes and co in such general terms?

I only ever set out to describe a set of individuals with their own thoughts and feelings, because that’s all literature can do.

Erm, I think this list of questions has just eaten its own tail! So I guess I should break out of the loop to ask if you’re working on anything new. What can we expect from you next?

Next novel, The Englishman at the Door, about a Russian-Jewish businessman who comes to England and tries to buy his way into Englishness.

Posted in A-Z | 3 Comments

Search engine terms

I’m in the middle of writing a proper post about Slough. And enjoyng the post-Christmas lull. But in the meantime, I’ve been getting some very interesting information from wordpress about the search engine terms people use to find this blog. Yesterday for instance, the following enquiries were made:

am i middle class quiz 2
stockists of cath kidston in southwold 1
middle class holiday destinations 1
gail’s crouch end 1
its-titty time feels 1
how do i throw out old furniture in shoreditch, london

The number of middle class shopping questions suggests I’m doing something right. But I can’t help worrying about the person looking for “its-titty time feels”.

Naturally, I plugged “its-titty time feels” straight into google. Even more surprising than the fact that this site came out first in the listings (out of a mighty 61,700,000 results) was the photograph at the top of the next entry:

The third listing gave the lyrics to a song called Tit-For-Tat. The fourth listing was: Microeconomics: Principles and Policy – Google Books Result .

I’m sure by this stage no one needs reminding that the internet is a strange place. Even so…

UPDATE

14 February 2011 – “london trustafarian twats”

13 January 2011 -” x rated knitting supplies”

14 January 2011 – “biby wood sex”

Posted in A-Z | 3 Comments

Crouch End (with preliminary rambling about Shoreditch)

Recently, I visited Hoxton and Shoreditch in East London in order to drink over-priced coffee and (earnest-middle-class-parent that I am) to visit to Nick Hornby’s admirable Ministry Of Stories and Monster Supply Store.

It’s an area I used to know quite well, since I lived in nearby Hackney when I hadn’t yet worked out quite how much I hated nightclubs and still worked on the fringes of the  media*.

Back then I mainly knew Shoreditch  by night. Now I was returning early on a Saturday. The smell of kebabs and beer and vomit still lingered on the streets, the urban equivalent of the fallen branches that show you a storm has passed through recently, even though everything now is empty and quiet. It emphasised that the intoxication of Friday was over – and that I wasn’t really going back at all. Visiting in the silent hour, a few years later, was  visiting the place anew.

I might have fallen into nostalgia at that realisation. Looking back over those  old haunts as a parent, homeowner and a reluctant, but undoubted, member of the bourgeoise, had the potential to induce wallowing. I’d spot countless small alterations, developments and collapses that would show me how much I myself must have changed and aged in the years since I’d last visited. I’d fall off into long sighing thoughts about mortality and wonder why I still hadn’t got a proper job and… Anyway. It wasn’t like that at all. I was actually pleased to note how much remained the same.  The 333 club still looked like a filthy (and I’m not using the word metaphorically), squalid (ditto), hole (okay, that’s a metaphor.)  The cafes still had authentically French babyfoot tables in them that no one used and still played achingly bad music. There were still posters and fliers on every blank space of wall. The graffiti probably may no longer have  been authentic Banksy, but it was still shit.

Photo credit: http://www.flickr.com/photos/zerochampion/3184674896/

Most notably, the people were all in their early 20s and trying very, very hard to make the most of those last years before responsible employment and thinning hair catastrophically limited their fashion options. The only material difference being  that The Shoredtich Twats (designer architects glasses,  white trainers and Hoxton finn haircut or ironic mullet) have now been replaced by hipsters (pointy shoes, skinny trousers, buzzcut hair or ironic mullet). These hipsters are undoubtedly funnier than the medieval jesters who have provided their style cues ever were. I’d recommend that anyone visits Hoxton simply for the people-watching, which is second to none. Especially on Saturday morning when those remaining on the streets are in such an advanced state of confusion and fashionable derangement.  They may be wallies, but at least they brighten the place up…

Photo credit: http://www.flickr.com/photos/sputnik57/3878243609/

… But I’m digressing again. The important thing  about all those 20-somethings was the absence they implied. There were a few prams in the Nick Hornby shop, but otherwise Shoreditch remained as it had been when I knew it, a place of unfettered youth. So where had all the original Shoreditch Twats gone now they were in their 30s and 40s?

My answer came the very next day when, coincidentally, I visited Crouch End. Pretty much the first thing I noticed when I got off  the bus was how much of a battle it was to get my daughter’s pram along the street. There was just no breaking through the serried ranks of three-wheelers pushed by angry-faced, greying men in architects glasses and – yes -  white trainers. And that’s when it hit me. Clearly Crouch End serves as a kind of elephant’s graveyard for middle-ageing trustafarians. Those who haven’t  fled for the shires have moved a few squares north to another kind of urban bubble. Which makes perfect sense. It’s all part of the cycle of life for a certain section of the middle class. The fashionable non-conformists who end up looking more like everybody else than anybody else does. If you see what I mean. Anyway. I liked Crouch End too.  And, more to the point, it could definitely be a contender for the most middle class place in Britain.

I was especially impressed by all the cafes that my friends and I were unable to get into, because we hadn’t booked.  (By the way, isn’t the concept of booking ahead in order to have a coffee and babycinno delightful? Only in a very certain type of British place would this be considered acceptable behaviour. People whose lives are so important that even their brief moments of flaneurship have to be timetabled. And for whom not getting in the *right* place is just too terrifying to contemplate. Once there was anxiety about Friday night guestlists at the 333. Now, you have to know the manager of the cafe with the best colouring pencils and baby chairs – and still phone him weeks in advance. Plus ca change, plus ca la meme chose…) We eventually found a place that didn’t have tasteful wooden furniture or organic smoothies, but did have plenty of seats, even though it was just a few doors down from the last cafe we’d tried to get in – one that was so full that steam came out of the door and the windows were dripping with condensation. Naturally, the non-fancy cafe provided one of the best espressos I’ve had in London… Which just goes to show…. something or other…

Photo credit: http://www.flickr.com/photos/mermaid99/3681480654/

Anyway, my visit was only brief. I took in only Waitrose, cafes, two health food shops, a gigantic expensive Italian deli, a nice little bookshop, the lovely modernist town hall and the general comfortable ambience. Luckily, my task in describing the place has been made much easier, because I don’t have to.  The author Linda Grant (one of the best writers in Britain today) has been veritably bombarding this site with hilarious details about life in the borough. So the best thing I can do for your entertainment and enlightenment is  to vacate the stage and let Linda do the talking. I should just note that her first  comment is a response to my assertion that Waitrose might be the most important keystone of middle-class life):

“For the record, the issue of Waitrose and the middle class is a little more fissured and fractured than you sneeringly make out. Here in Crouch End we first had the opportunity to get a Waitrose back in the early 90s but it was nixed by a campaign of local busybodies who said it would bring cars into the area. They wanted to get in their cars and drive to someone else’s area. We then had to sit it out for a further 17 years with only a Budgens, until a year ago when Waitrose took over the defunct Woolworths where generations of North London children had honed their shoplifting skills.

“Once again the campaigners arose, putting out leaflets about how ‘Haterose’ was not welcome. They were perfectly happy to see the Woolworths remain a decaying and unlettable eyesore, with no proposals as to what it should become other than ‘the Council could turn it into an arts centre.’

“Fortunately Haringey Council ignored the grumbles of this small clique of malcontents and we now have our Waitrose. Though still no tube station. We like to think that makes us a bit special.”

Linda continued:

“Actually, to be fair, I should point out that Budgens had been taken over by a new manager. Whereas before its extensive selection of Pot Noodles and plastic-wrapped Cheddar had been second to none, he had brought in locally sourced and organic products and became the subject of a profile in the Independent. So there was anxiety that Waitrose would close it down. An unfounded fear, though personally I haven’t been in there once since Waitrose opened. Causing ill-feeling between me and Becky Swift, daughter of Margaret Drabble who is resolutely boycotting Waitrose.”

And then went on:

“I don’t think you have even scratched the surface of Crouch End, to be honest.
I forgot to mention that part of the reason for the defeat of the Haterose campaign was a rumour which went around implying that if Waitrose didn’t acquire the site, Poundland was hard on its heels. I think you can all guess who was the source of THAT. (Me, in part)
Education, as you can imagine, is a big issue in our neighbourhood. Our excellent primary school, named after a Romantic poet from nearby and more expensive Highgate, was built on the site of the old Hornsey Art College, famous for its sit-ins in the 60s. Some of the art students of that era stayed on in their bedsits, eventually acquiring the whole property, and are now retired in warmer climates on the vast equity from 40 years of rising property prices.

“It’s the secondary schools that are the problem We are devoutly left-wing in Crouch End, so much so that we threw out the Tony Bliar-backed Labour MP two elections ago and replaced her with a LibDem. This hasn’t worked out quite as well as we anticipated, particularly as Jacinta and Jasper are both planning to do Oxbridge entrance.
The two state options are Hornsey School for Girls, which sounds so encouraging when you think of that marvellous letter in the Guardian from the pupils of Camden School for Girls, about their decision to bunk off to join the student protests. But it turns out that Hornsey School for Girls is populated by large frightening black girls from Finsbury Park with expensive weaves and small Muslim girls in hijabs, sent there by their protective parents so they can be removed from any proximity to the male sex. That leaves Highgate Wood which gets 32 per cent in the league tables and is an attractive option for ambitious parents from Tottenham whose local comp gets 6 per cent.

“So that leaves private education or Exodus. Up the great mountainous incline to Muswell Hill which has the highest performing comprehensive in London and a catchment area currently measured at 4.3 inches.

“They try to sneer down at us in Crouch End but in reality, we are sneering up at them. They only have a Sainsbury’s. We have a Waitrose.”

And on!

“I’ll add a little more. When the Haterose campaign was asked what they suggested should be in the closed-down Woolworths, they said, ‘Well, the council could turn it into an art gallery.’

“Unfortunately, Crouch End’s three LibDem ward councillors carry little weight with overwhelmingly Labour Haringey Council. We’re severely disappointed that the Kurdish community of Wood Green continues to vote for Tony Bliar’s party, motivated no doubt by self-interest in connection with the Iraq war.

“In all fairness to Highgate Wood, however (which isn’t in Highgate, unfortunately, if it were it wouldn’t have that Tottenham catchment area) it does have as one of its alumnae the publicist for Virago books. Oh and that woman from the X Files went to our primary school, as did Tariq Ali’s kids.”

So there you are.  Anyone else got an opinion on Crouch End? Could there be anything that the incredible, eloquent  Linda Grant has missed? And where should I look next?

Please do let me know!

(Oh and if you enjoyed Linda’s messages, you’ll be pleased to hear that she has a new book coming out in January, We Had It So Good. Thanks to my fortunate position as a sometime blogger on the Guardian, I’ve been lucky enough to read it and would like to take this opportunity to be one of the first critics in the UK to make a painfully weak pun based on the title. Yes, it’s good. Very good.)

 

STOP PRESS

A very funny** new poem has been written lamenting the death of Crouch End and loss of Prospero’s Books. You can find it all on the Hornsey Journal. Here’s a small sample to whet your appetite:

“When they came for The Creamery, I did not speak out
Because I already have too much cholesterol, and gout.
When they came for Word Play, I had a tiny blub,
But now I buy kids’ stuff from Rub A Dub
When they came for Just Natural, actually shouted hooray
At the passing of yet another overpriced cafe.”

 

*Rather than my current position, hanging onto the outer edges by my fingernails, living in Norwich, like Alan Partridge. I’m amazed you scrolled down for this footnote, by the way. Was it worth it?

** ahem

Posted in MiddleClassTowns | 14 Comments

News flash

There’s an interesting survey reported in the Guardian (on one of their superb data blogs) about the “Real Middle Britain”. It’s debatable whether, in the complex and crazy language of class “Middle Britain” and middle class are one and the same thing. I don’t have time now, but it’s also going to be interesting to read about the 400 variables upon which the agency based their data. But, in the meantime, if anyone has anything to say about any of the towns in the top 50, I’d be interested to hear it.

1 Slough
2 Rushmoor
3 Bexley
4 Spelthorne
5 Harrow
6 Bracknell Forest
7 Broxbourne
8 Hillingdon
9 Dartford
10 Milton Keynes
11 Wokingham
12 Swindon
13 Redbridge
14 South Gloucestershire
15 Eastleigh
16 West Berkshire
17 Hart
18 Epsom and Ewell
19 Blaby
20 Watford
21 Woking
22 Central Bedfordshire
23 Havering
24 Trafford
25 Hounslow
26 Thurrock
27 Tonbridge and Malling
28 Sutton
29 Magherafelt
30 Hertsmere
31 Chelmsford
32 Surrey Heath
33 Gloucester
34 Reigate and Banstead
35 East Hertfordshire
36 Limavady
37 Cherwell
38 South Ribble
39 Fareham
40 Warrington
41 Crawley
42 Castlereagh
43 Runnymede
44 Basingstoke and Deane
45 Mid Sussex
46 Luton
47 Rochford
48 Antrim
49 Dacorum
50 Wycombe
Posted in MiddleClassTowns | 1 Comment

Quick Lewes flash*

Steerforth, whom I mentioned in my last post, and who runs the wondeful blog, The Age Of Uncertainty, has posted a really interesting article. It’s not only about Lewes, but about the appeal (as well as comedy value) of middle class life – and, indeed, the sad truth that class can still be a life sentence in the UK…

He also posted this charming video:

I like the sound of Lewes more and more.

In his post Steerforth also raises two other very good points: Southwold and Hebden Bridge.

I shall hopefully be looking into them soon. Am thinking that Crouch End might be the best subject for next week, but I’m open to suggestions…

*Yes, that headline only works if you don’t know how to pronounce Lewes in the proper middle class way… but anyway…

Posted in MiddleClassTowns | 2 Comments